British Had “Colonial Aims in Iran”
Abdollah Entezam Outlines Iran's Position on Oil

Arash Norouzi
The Mossadegh Project | May 25, 2019                     


Iranian Foreign Minister Abdollah Entezam (1895-1983) Foreign Minister Abdollah Entezam transmitted the following working outline of the Iranian stance towards the prospect of a final settlement of the Iranian oil dispute on Nov. 1, 1953.

Entezam had promised the memo, expressly intended to be tentative and non-committal, during an Oct. 28th dinner discussion with Amb. Henderson, Hoover, Premier Fazlollah Zahedi and himself. Henderson, of course, shared it with England, along with three other State Department officials.

Considering that the paper was pre-approved by the Shah and Zahedi, note the strong language about the British in the opening paragraph, perfectly echoing the supposed “fanatic nationalism” rhetoric of the departed Mossadegh.

U.S. State Department Documents | IRAN
Iran Oil Consortium | Archive of Documents (1953-1954)




888.2553/11–253: Telegram

No. 378

The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State [Loy W. Henderson to State Dept.]

TEHRAN, November 2, 1953—2 p.m.


SECRET
PRIORITY


1022. For Bedell Smith, Byroade, Phleger only. [Under Sec. of State Walter Bedell Smith, diplomat Henry Byroade and legal advisor Herman Phleger] [The] Following is [a] translation [of a] document handed [to] Hoover [special envoy Herbert Hoover, Jr.] and me by the Foreign Minister [Abdollah Entezam] [the] evening [of] November 1:

(Embtel [embassy telegram] 1020 November 2; repeated London 3022) (translation from Persian). [“Telegram 1020 summarized the conversation during the meeting at which Entezam handed the document to Hoover and Henderson. (888.2553/11–253).” — Office of the Historian]

“The following points are by no means binding on the Iranian Government. They are for information purposes only:

1. After the former oil co (i.e. AIOC-translator’s note) started to operate in Iran, and as it[s] organization expanded, the directors of the company uniformly had colonial aims in Iran and their behavior was of a nature that incurred public odium. Interferences by the agents of the former oil company in the affairs of Iran and their connection with doubtful characters caused trouble for Iranian officials and created all kinds of difficulties. Their influence was so great even in England and among British representatives in Iran that by deluding the minds and concealing the facts they prevented the British Government from getting a true picture of conditions in Iran and from carrying out a policy that would be in the interest of both countries. Consequently it was never possible to establish the relations between the two countries on a basis of mutual respect and sincerity. On the contrary, however, conditions were always conducive to misunderstanding and tension. Also from a financial and economic standpoint the interests of the Iranian Government were always being adversely affected, and the company failed to carry out its rightful and moral obligations to its personnel and to the laborers. In view of these facts it is impossible for the former company to return to Iran. [Anglo-Iranian Oil Company]

2. It seems to the government that negotiations for Iran sale, transportation and distribution of oil should be initiated with the representatives of a group of large international companies having had previous experience. Such group should purchase oil from the National Iranian Oil Company and undertake to handle its transportation and distribution. The former company may take part in this group, but not to such extent that it could own the majority of the shares. If other British companies desire to join the group, their total shares must not exceed fifty percent. On the conclusion of an agreement and during the first years when the flow of Iranian oil to the market has not been restored to a normal state these companies must extend considerable financial assistance to the Iranian Government, to be gradually reimbursed out of revenues accruing in future years. Also these companies must assume certain obligations to purchase refined oil so that the Abadan refinery may operate to its productive capacity.

3. As to the question of compensation the companies purchasing oil and undertaking to transport and distribute must make an arrangement with the former company for a settlement that would obviate further anxiety in this respect. It goes without saying that no claim for loss of profits should be taken into consideration.

4. The Iranian Government believes that it would be desirable for the success of the work if the International Bank were to act as intermediary in the conclusion of an agreement between Iran and the group of companies taking over the transportation and distribution and undertake to examine the accounts and supervise the enforcement of the agreement.

5. In order that companies in charge of transportation and distribution may be sure that the NIOC will be able to meet its obligations in point of quantity and quality, a solution agreeable to both parties will be found through negotiations between the two parties.

6. An agreement between Iran and the companies for transportation and distribution must be drawn up in such a manner that at no time in the future Iranian interests would be adversely affected, i.e., whenever the price of oil increases, the Iranian Government should benefit from such increase and that its income should at no time be less than the maximum accruing to others.”


HENDERSON


• Bracketed text added for better readability. [Annotations by Arash Norouzi]

• Source: Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954, Iran, 1951–1954, Volume X (1989)

• “Repeated to London eyes only for the Ambassador.” — U.S. State Department Office of the Historian.



Search MohammadMossadegh.com



Related links:

Amb. Henderson and Herbert Hoover, Jr.’s Dinner With Zahedi, Entezam (Oct. 1953)

U.S. Says Oil Deal Is A “Significant Victory” For Iran (Oct. 28, 1954)

John Foster Dulles: “Extreme nationalization is the greatest problem” (Sept. 23, 1953)



MOSSADEGH t-shirts — “If I sit silently, I have sinned”

Facebook  Twitter  YouTube  Tumblr   Instagram